Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
I think it would be a good time for a release. With or without 1065 and 1066 is fine imo. Having a checklist for the release would be handy. But I am happy if Jerome handles it as usual. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Any update on the next release? When will it be available? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Do we have any plans for the next release? I'd need to decide if I patch the flathub build downstream with the appstream data updates in order to rebuild it with updated libraries but I'd rather not. (Mainly for reasons of stubbornness and laziness tbh. Still a bit annoyed by the flathub team just breaking stuff and us maintainers needing to pick up the pieces.)
In general it might be a good idea because we have some new features and at least one bug fixed that is not yet released. I'd suggest to wait for #1065 and #1066 for another great feature addition 🚀
Maybe after they are reviewed and merged we call for translations and then do a release? Any thoughts?
Edit: Reminder to update the pot/po files before call for translations and the metainfo before release.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions