Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FSDP] Fixed docs for inter/intra node PG helpers #126288

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

awgu
Copy link
Contributor

@awgu awgu commented May 15, 2024

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

  1. This fixes an issue where we had 9 ranks in one node and 7 in the other.
  2. This makes the notation more explicit that [0, 7] is [0, 1, ..., 7].

cc @mrshenli @pritamdamania87 @zhaojuanmao @satgera @gqchen @aazzolini @osalpekar @jiayisuse @H-Huang @kwen2501 @penguinwu @fegin @XilunWu @wanchaol @fduwjj @wz337 @tianyu-l @wconstab @yf225 @chauhang @d4l3k

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 15, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/126288

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 2abd548 with merge base afda668 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added ciflow/inductor oncall: distributed Add this issue/PR to distributed oncall triage queue release notes: distributed (fsdp) release notes category labels May 15, 2024
@awgu awgu added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label May 15, 2024
@awgu awgu requested review from wanchaol and weifengpy May 15, 2024 14:49
@awgu awgu marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2024 14:49
@awgu
Copy link
Contributor Author

awgu commented May 15, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

ZelboK pushed a commit to ZelboK/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 19, 2024
1. This fixes an issue where we had 9 ranks in one node and 7 in the other.
2. This makes the notation more explicit that `[0, 7]` is `[0, 1, ..., 7]`.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#126288
Approved by: https://github.com/weifengpy
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged oncall: distributed Add this issue/PR to distributed oncall triage queue release notes: distributed (fsdp) release notes category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants