Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Teams integration #4386

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Teams integration #4386

wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

benjaminpkane
Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane commented May 10, 2024

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Automated integration into the Teams SDK

What areas of FiftyOne does this PR affect?

  • App: FiftyOne application changes
  • Build: Build and test infrastructure changes
  • Core: Core fiftyone Python library changes
  • Documentation: FiftyOne documentation changes
  • Other

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new job that triggers a workflow in another repository, enhancing automation and integration capabilities.
  • Improvements

    • Updated the all-tests job to include the new job as a dependency, ensuring comprehensive test coverage.
    • Added fetch-depth: 0 parameter to the release workflow for more efficient repository checkouts.

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane added the ci GitHub actions and other continuous integration tasks label May 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the repository's GitHub workflows involve adding a new job named teams in the pr.yml file, which triggers a workflow in another repository. Additionally, the all-tests job now depends on this new teams job. In the push-release.yml file, the fetch-depth: 0 parameter was added to the actions/checkout@v4 step to ensure a full history is fetched.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/pr.yml Added new teams job to trigger a workflow in another repository and made all-tests dependent on it.
.github/workflows/push-release.yml Added fetch-depth: 0 parameter to the actions/checkout@v4 step.

Poem

In the realm of code, a change unfolds,
New jobs and steps, a tale retold.
With teams we reach beyond our gate,
Ensuring tests, we orchestrate.
Fetching deep, no history lost,
Our workflows shine, no matter the cost.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to full the review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9d02f2 and 063f2d7.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/pr.yml (2)

22-38: Ensure secure handling of GitHub tokens and user credentials.

Verification successful

The search across the repository did not find any additional references to the secrets.FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN outside of the specific workflow file under review. This suggests that the token is used in a restricted and potentially secure manner, as it is not exposed or referenced elsewhere in the codebase. Based on this evidence, the handling of the GitHub token in the workflow appears to be secure.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the GitHub token and user credentials are securely handled.

# Test: Search for the GitHub token usage in the repository. Expect: Secure practices.
rg --type yaml 'secrets.FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN' --glob '*.yml'

Length of output: 61



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Broaden the search for the GitHub token usage to include all file types in the repository.

# Test: Search for the GitHub token usage across all files in the repository. Expect: Secure practices.
rg 'secrets.FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN'

Length of output: 34


41-44: Verify the behavior when the teams job fails.

Verification successful

The behavior of the all-tests job when the teams job fails has been confirmed through the workflow configuration. The all-tests job is set to proceed only if all dependent jobs, including the teams job, succeed. This matches the expected behavior outlined in the review comment.

  • The all-tests job is correctly configured to not proceed if the teams job fails, as indicated by the condition in the workflow file.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the behavior of the `all-tests` job when the `teams` job fails.

# Test: Simulate a failure in the `teams` job and observe the behavior of the `all-tests` job.
# Expect: The `all-tests` job should not proceed if the `teams` job fails.
echo "Simulating failure in 'teams' job..."
# Simulate failure scenario here

Length of output: 88



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the GitHub Actions workflow file to confirm the behavior when the 'teams' job fails.

# Use 'cat' to display the content of the workflow file where the 'all-tests' job is defined.
cat .github/workflows/pr.yml

Length of output: 1165

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 063f2d7 and d44440e.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane force-pushed the chore/teams-pr branch 3 times, most recently from 0c91db9 to de9692e Compare May 10, 2024 15:12
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d44440e and de9692e.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.01%. Comparing base (8b225c4) to head (445b35f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Current head 445b35f differs from pull request most recent head 28f11dc

Please upload reports for the commit 28f11dc to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop    #4386       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage    99.27%   16.01%   -83.27%     
============================================
  Files           47      807      +760     
  Lines        16212    89340    +73128     
  Branches         0     1342     +1342     
============================================
- Hits         16095    14308     -1787     
- Misses         117    75032    +74915     
Flag Coverage Δ
app 16.01% <ø> (?)
python ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de9692e and 31941db.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/pr.yml (2)

22-38: Ensure the security of the GitHub token and validate the workflow parameters.

Verification successful

Let's verify the usage of the GitHub token and other parameters in the workflow file by searching for their occurrences and ensuring they are used correctly.


The verification confirms that the GitHub token and other parameters are used correctly in the workflow file.

  • The github_token is correctly referenced as ${{ secrets.FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN }}.
  • The client_payload correctly includes ${{ github.event.pull_request.user }} and ${{ github.event.number }}.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the security settings for the GitHub token and the correctness of the workflow parameters.

# Test: Check the repository settings for the token permissions.
gh api /repos/voxel51/fiftyone/actions/secrets/FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN --jq '.permissions'

Length of output: 285



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the GitHub token and other parameters in the workflow file.

# Search for the usage of the GitHub token in the workflow file.
rg 'secrets.FIFTYONE_GITHUB_TOKEN' .github/workflows/pr.yml

# Search for the usage of other parameters in the workflow file.
rg 'github.event.pull_request.user' .github/workflows/pr.yml
rg 'github.event.number' .github/workflows/pr.yml

Length of output: 475


41-44: Validate the conditional logic and dependencies in the all-tests job.

Verification successful

The all-tests job is correctly defined with dependencies on the build, teams, and test jobs. The conditional logic within the steps section is also correctly implemented to run only if all dependencies succeed.

  • .github/workflows/pr.yml:
    all-tests:
      runs-on: ubuntu-latest
      needs: [build, teams, test]
      if: always()
      steps:
        - run: sh -c ${{ needs.build.result == 'success' && needs.teams.result == 'success' && needs.test.result == 'success' }}
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the conditional logic and dependencies in the `all-tests` job.

# Test: Check the workflow execution logs to ensure the conditional logic is functioning as expected.
gh run list --workflow pr.yml --limit 5

Length of output: 573



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the execution details of the `all-tests` job to ensure it respects the conditional logic based on the results of its dependencies.

# Fetch the latest 5 runs of the `all-tests` job to check their statuses and dependencies.
gh run list --workflow pr.yml --limit 5 --json name,status,conclusion,startedAt,completedAt --jq '.[] | select(.name == "all-tests")'

Length of output: 362



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the execution details of the `all-tests` job to ensure it respects the conditional logic based on the results of its dependencies.

# Fetch the latest 5 runs of the `all-tests` job to check their statuses and dependencies.
gh run list --workflow pr.yml --limit 5 --json name,status,conclusion,startedAt,updatedAt --jq '.[] | select(.name == "all-tests")'

Length of output: 133



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and configuration of the `all-tests` job in the workflow file.

# Search for the `all-tests` job definition in the workflow file.
rg 'all-tests' .github/workflows/pr.yml

Length of output: 52



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the full definition of the `all-tests` job from the workflow file.

# Extract the `all-tests` job definition from the workflow file.
awk '/all-tests:/,/^[^ ]/' .github/workflows/pr.yml

Length of output: 280

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane changed the title [HOLD] Teams integration Teams integration May 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 31941db and 8c0b863.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c0b863 and 945bffc.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 945bffc and 9e4bab0.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e4bab0 and ead2740.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ead2740 and 6a02d99.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a02d99 and 1141d7c.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/push-release.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/push-release.yml

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1141d7c and 7c6ff16.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/push-release.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/push-release.yml

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c6ff16 and 28f11dc.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr.yml

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci GitHub actions and other continuous integration tasks
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants